History of Architecture I

SYLLABUS

CONTENT

This course traces the history of Architecture from the early developments in the Paleolithic Age (Early Stone Age) through the Renaissance (16th century). The various theories and formal languages (styles) that shaped the history of Architecture within the specified time span will be explored through the close examination of a select group of buildings and the specific cultural, social, political and economic contexts of their design and construction. The primary focus of the course will be on Western Architecture and culture. The architecture of the Middle East, East Asian, Americas and African will be explored through specific readings.

 

OBJECTIVE

Treating the history of architecture as a history not of buildings per se, but of cultural beliefs and ideas, values and aesthetic ideals actualized through architectural forms and experiences, this course seeks to foster the students' ability to analyze and understand the unique formal vocabulary of architecture and its expressive potential, as well as the complex and instrumental dialogue between architecture and culture.

 

FORMAT

This course will meet Online twice a week on Mondays and Wednesdays from 11:00 AM to 12:15 PM for lecture, presentation and discussion sessions.

 

READING

The required text for this course, available through the campus bookstore, is:

 

Marvin Trachtenberg & Isabelle Hyman:

Architecture - from Prehistory to Post-Modernism

Second Edition, New York: Pearson, 2002

 

The reading assignments for each week are listed in the Lecture Outline. In addition to readings from the required text, there will be additional required readings on the architecture of the Middle East, East Asia, Americas and Africa.  These will be available in pdf format, linked to the listing of each related reading in the Lecture Outline.

The lectures and the reading assignments do not necessarily cover the same material, nor do they necessarily follow the same sequence in presentation.  Rather, they are intended to complement each other, provide different perspectives on each subject and help the students develop their own critical approach to the study of architecture and its history.

In addition to the required text for this course, you may wish to consult and review any of the following similar texts:

 

Francis D. K. Ching, Mark M. Jarzombek, Vikramaditya Prakash

A Global History of Architecture

John Wiley & Sons, 2010

 

Marian Moffett, Lawrence Wodehouse, Michael Fazio

A World History of Architecture

McGraw-Hill Professional, 2008

 

Leland M. Roth

Understanding Architecture: Its Elements, History, And Meaning

Westview Press, 2nd edition, 2006

 

Richard Ingersoll

World Architecture: A Cross Cultural History

Oxford University Press, 2018

 

Dan Cruickshank (Editor)

Sir Banister Fletcher's A History of Architecture

Architectural Press, 1996

 

Spiro Kostof, Gregory Castillo, Richard Tobias

A History of Architecture: Settings and Rituals

Oxford University Press, 1995

 

You may substitute any one of these texts for the required text at your own risk.

 

REQUIREMENTS

Your performance is evaluated on the bases of individual command of course material and the assigned readings as evidenced by effective synthesis of course material and completion of three Online exams. You will complete each exam Online at Canvas in class on the following dates:

Exam 1: Monday, February 22, 2021

Exam 2: Wednesday, March 31, 2021

Exam 3: Monday, May 10, 2021

In addition to the three exams, you are required to complete a research term paper on a building of your choice from a provided list of buildings. For a detailed description of this assignment please refer to the Term Paper Assignment appended to this syllabus. The Term paper will be due:

Term Paper: Wednesday, April 7, 2021

Please submit your term paper Online at Canvas as a Microsoft word or a pdf document. Please label your file using your name, e.g., JaneDoe.doc Please make certain your file is properly labeled.

All due dates should be strictly observed. In fairness to all, exceptions will only be made due to medical or personal emergencies.

The exams and the term paper will each count for 25% of the final grade for the course.

Your success in this class depends on constant and effective engagement with the course material. To this end, you are required to complete the assigned readings prior to each class and to write a one to two-page synopsis of the material covered in lectures and assigned readings for each week. These will be of great assistance to you in answering the exam questions. Please carefully read the detailed explanation of the exam requirements at the end of this syllabus.

 

EXTRA CREDIT

You may choose, at your own discretion, to take an extra credit exam covering the course content from the first and the second exams. This should be helpful to anyone who may not have done as well as hoped in the first two exams. The extra credit exam will be given on:

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

If you choose to take this extra credit exam, your final grade will be based on 4 exams and a paper (20% each), rather than 3 exams and a paper (25% each).

 

 

ATTENDANCE

You are required to attend every class and actively participate in class discussions. Every unexcused absence will result in the lowering of your final grade by a third of a numeric grade (for example, from C+ to C). Four or more unexcused absences will result in a failing grade for the course. Absences will be excused by prior and/or timely notice due to family emergencies, medial conditions, and established religious holidays.

 

Online

Individual dates in the Lecture Outline of the Online syllabus will be linked to a video of the visual material presented in class on that date.

 

CONTACT

 

UNIVERSITY WIDE POLICIES

Please review the following university wide policies:

 

 

 

LECTURE OUTLINE

____________________________________

 Lecture Topic

Tentative Date

Reading Assignment

____________________________________

Neolithic, and Egyptian Architecture

January 20 - 25

Trachtenberg/Hyman: pp.49-76

____________________________________

Egyptian & Aegean Architecture

January 27, February 1 - 3

Trachtenberg/Hyman: pp.76-89

___________________________________

 Architecture of Ancient Greece

February 8 - 10  - 15 - 17

Trachtenberg/Hyman: pp.91-115

Architecture of Ancient India and Southeast Asia

Fazio, Moffett/Wodehouse: pp.63-79

____________________________________

February 22                               First Exam

____________________________________

Roman Architecture

February 24, March 1 - 3 - 8 - 10

Trachtenberg/Hyman: pp.116-157

Architecture of China and Japan

Fazio, Moffett/Wodehouse: pp.81-103

____________________________________

Early Christian & Byzantine Architecture

March 15 - 17

Trachtenberg/Hyman: pp.161-183

____________________________________

Carolingian & Romanesque Architecture

March 22 - 24 - 29

Trachtenberg/Hyman: pp.185-211

Islamic Architecture

Fazio, Moffett/Wodehouse: pp.153-175

____________________________________

March 31                                 Second Exam

____________________________________

Gothic Architecture

April 5 - 7 - 12 - 14

Trachtenberg/Hyman: pp.213-273

Architecture of the Americas and Africa

Fazio, Moffett/Wodehouse: pp.251-283

____________________________________

April 7                                      Term Paper

____________________________________

April 19 - 21                             Spring Break

____________________________________

Renaissance Architecture

April 26 - 28, May 3 - 5

Trachtenberg/Hyman: pp.277-325

____________________________________

May 10                           Third Exam

____________________________________

May 12                             Extra Credit Exam

____________________________________

 

 

 

 

Exams

 

Chartres is made of stone and glass. But it is not just stone and glass; it is a cathedral, and not only a cathedral, but a particular cathedral built at a particular time by certain members of a particular society. To understand what it means, to perceive it for what it is, you need to know rather more than the generic properties of stone and glass and rather more than what is common to all cathedrals. You need to understand also - and, in my opinion, most critically - the specific concepts of the relations among God, man, and architecture that, since they have governed its creation, it consequently embodies. (Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures, Harper, New York, 1973)

 

To every work of architecture there is a what and there is a why. The what pertains to its tangible characteristics. The why pertains to the intangible reasons, ideas, beliefs, and ideals that condition every work of architecture and transform the work into a cultural artifact.

Every work of architecture is essentially a composition, i.e., it is comprised of distinct parts placed in a particular relationship to each other for a particular purpose. To understand a work of architecture requires, first and foremost, an analysis of the work. It entails separating and identifying its constituent parts and their specific relationship to each other and to the whole work, e.g., the specific relationship between solids and voids, horizontals and verticals, of the inside to the outside, of structure to skin, of the building to its site, ornamentation, articulation, etc. This is, however, merely a first step. The more important step in understanding a work of architecture is the why of the work.

From a certain vantage point, architecture is an impossible task. Faced with multiple possibilities, the architect has no ground for the delimitation of her/his options. The functions of an edifice suggest no one form and much less a direction. In deference to biological needs, function is nebulous and multi-directional. However, function assumes a trajectory and becomes highly prescriptive, when it is appropriated by culture and transformed into a ritual. Though by no means singular, a ritual is distinct and unidirectional. It has unique spatial requirements. It demands a specific setting. It is this and similar prescriptive cultural appropriations that make architecture possible.

Every work of architecture points to a process of delimitation intended to give expression to a particular cultural proposition, theorem, or thesis. As such, every work of architecture serves to transform a culture’s assumptions about the world into a factual experience of them. The work shapes the world, in other words, after our image of it. In this process economy, ecology, and technology play an important role. They make the realization of certain dreams possible and others not. The shape any work of architecture takes is invariably conditioned by the interaction of these three forces within the broader cultural context

Therefore, to understand the why of any work of architecture is to understand the cultural rituals it is meant to provide for, the cultural experiences it is meant to instigate and the ideas, the ideals, the beliefs it is meant to embody and express.

Throughout the term, we will address both the what and the why of every work of architecture we examine. Lectures will specifically emphasize the why. Your aim throughout the term should be to understand architecture in the sense explained above. In this vain, the point and purpose of the four required exams for this course are not to test your command of the facts, names, dates, and places, per se. Although you are expected to be in full command of the facts as such, the intent of the exams is to test your understanding of architecture. Mere and passive acquisition and repetition of information is not what is at issue. What the exams are meant to test is your active engagement with and the ability to comprehend and effectively synthesize diverse bodies of information and points of view provided in the lectures and reading assignments. What they are meant to foster is your ability to effectively analyze and hierarchically organize this information into a coherent and multi-layered picture that encompasses both the what and the why of architecture.

For each exam, you’ll be presented with multiple questions and asked to ascertain the accuracy of each.

You will complete each exam Online at Canvas in class on the following dates:

Exam 1: Monday, February 22, 2021

Exam 2: Wednesday, March 31, 2021

Exam 3: Monday, May 10, 2021

All due dates should be strictly observed. In fairness to all, exceptions will only be made due to medical or personal emergencies.

The exams will each count for one fourth of the final grade.

Your success in this class depends on constant and effective engagement with the course material. To this end, you are required to complete the assigned readings prior to each class and to write a one to two-page synopsis of the material covered in lectures and assigned readings for each week. These will be of great help to you in answering the exam questions. At all cost, make certain you do not fall behind in completing your weekly reading assignments. Given the complexity and scope of the material covered, you will not be able to comprehend and effectively answer the exam questions, if you do not complete your weekly assignments on time.

 

Exam Grade

If your exam score is 93 or higher, you will receive a grade of A for the exam. If your exam score is 89 to 92, you will receive a grade of A- for the exam. If your exam score is 85 to 88, you will receive a grade of B+ for the exam. If your exam score is 81 to 84, you will receive a grade of B for the exam. If your exam score is 78 to 80, you will receive a grade of B- for the exam. If your exam score is 75 to 77, you will receive a grade of C+ for the exam. If your exam score is 71 to 74, you will receive a grade of C for the exam. If your exam score is 68 to 70, you will receive a grade of C- for the exam. If your exam score is 65 to 67, you will receive a grade of D+ for the exam. If your exam score is 61 to 64, you will receive a grade of D for the exam. If your exam score is 58 to 60, you will receive a grade of D- for the exam. If your exam score is less than 58, you will receive a grade of F for the exam.

 

 

 

Term Paper

 

Chartres is made of stone and glass. But it is not just stone and glass; it is a cathedral, and not only a cathedral, but a particular cathedral built at a particular time by certain members of a particular society. To understand what it means, to perceive it for what it is, you need to know rather more than the generic properties of stone and glass and rather more than what is common to all cathedrals. You need to understand also - and, in my opinion, most critically - the specific concepts of the relations among God, man, and architecture that, since they have governed its creation, it consequently embodies. (Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures, Harper, New York, 1973)

 

To every work of architecture there is a what and there is a why. The what pertains to its tangible characteristics. The why pertains to the intangible reasons, ideas, beliefs, and ideals that condition every work of architecture and transform the work into a cultural artifact.

Every work of architecture is essentially a composition, i.e., it is comprised of distinct parts placed in a particular relationship to each other for a particular purpose. To understand a work of architecture requires, first and foremost, an analysis of the work. It entails separating and identifying its constituent parts and their specific relationship to each other and to the whole work, e.g., the specific relationship between solids and voids, horizontals and verticals, of the inside to the outside, of structure to skin, of the building to its site, ornamentation, articulation, etc. This is, however, merely a first step. The more important step in understanding a work of architecture is the why of the work.

From a certain vantage point, architecture is an impossible task. Faced with multiple possibilities, the architect has no ground for the delimitation of her/his options. The functions of an edifice suggest no one form and much less a direction. In deference to biological needs, function is nebulous and multi-directional. However, function assumes a trajectory and becomes highly prescriptive, when it is appropriated by culture and transformed into a ritual. Though by no means singular, a ritual is distinct and unidirectional. It has unique spatial requirements. It demands a specific setting. It is this and similar prescriptive cultural appropriations that make architecture possible.

Every work of architecture points to a process of delimitation intended to give expression to a particular cultural proposition, theorem, or thesis. As such, every work of architecture serves to transform a culture’s assumptions about the world into a factual experience of them. The work shapes the world, in other words, after our image of it. In this process economy, ecology, and technology play an important role. They make the realization of certain dreams possible and others not. The shape any work of architecture takes is invariably conditioned by the interaction of these three forces within the broader cultural context

Therefore, to understand the why of any work of architecture is to understand the cultural rituals it is meant to provide for, the cultural experiences it is meant to instigate and the ideas, the ideals, the beliefs it is meant to embody and express.

Throughout the term, we will address both the what and the why of every work of architecture we examine. Lectures will specifically emphasize the why. Your aim throughout the term should be to understand architecture in the sense explained above. In this vain, the point and purpose of the term paper is to give you an opportunity to acquire a more thorough understanding of the formal and theoretical issues and concerns, ideas and ideals of a generation of architects working within a specific cultural, social, political, and economic context that on the whole is of particular interest to you.

The task is then four fold:

  1. Research the history of the development of the building and its design, including the various architectural issues and concerns, ideas and ideals that conditioned the design of this and other buildings of its generation.
  2. Research the cultural, social, political and economic context within which and in response to which this building was developed.
  3. Research and analyze the particular formal characteristics of the building you have chosen in light of the above research. This entails a careful analysis of the overall spatial organization, the relationship of parts to whole, of solids to voids, of volume to mass, of the inside to the outside, the particular expressions of structure and material, the particular articulation of surface, proportion, scale, etc.
  4. Formulate and present a concise discussion of your research, whereby you clearly demonstrate the integral relationship between the formal attributes of the building you have chosen and the theoretical concerns, and ideals of its architect and his or her generation as this relationship is established and developed in response to the particular demands of a specific social, cultural, economic, and political context.

Your paper should be approximately 4500 words, excluding bibliography and images. It should, therefore, be well organized, concisely written and economically worded. Every quotation should be identified as such and properly credited. Quotations should not exceed 10% of the paper. Footnotes should appear on the same page and the bibliography on the last page, in MLA format. The paper, on the whole, should clearly demonstrate extensive research above and beyond the assigned readings and lecture material as well as a thorough understanding of the architectural period chosen.

Your research should be based exclusively on peer-reviewed academic journals and book publications. You research should not be based on nonacademic web sources, travel guides, etc.

The paper is due The paper is due April 7, 2021.

Before submitting your paper, please have your paper proof read by Grammerly. It is a free Online service at https://www.grammarly.com.

Please submit your term paper Online at Canvas as a Microsoft word or pdf document.  Please label your file using your name, e.g., JaneDoe.docx.

Graded papers will be returned to you by the week of May 3, 2021.

 

Evaluation Criteria

Your paper will be evaluated based on the following criteria. Please make certain you effectively address each criterion in your paper.

  1. How well does the paper evidence a clear understanding of the history of the development of the building and its design?
  2. How well does the paper evidence a clear understanding and explanation of the various architectural issues and concerns, ideas and ideals that conditioned the design of this and other buildings of its generation?
  3. How well does the paper evidence a clear understanding and explanation of the cultural, social, political and economic context within which and in response to which the building was developed?
  4. How well does the paper provide a careful and analytical discussion of the formal attributes of the building?
  5. How well does the paper demonstrate the integral relationship between the formal attributes of the building and the theoretical concerns, and ideals of its architect and his or her generation?
  6. How well does the paper analyze and discuss the link between the formal and theoretical attributes of the building and the specific social, cultural, economic, and political context of the buildings development?
  7. How well does the paper demonstrate extensive research above and beyond the assigned readings and lecture material?
  8. Is the paper content clearly organized, logically sequenced, and coherently presented?
  9. Are there any errors of fact in the paper?
  10. Are there grammatical and/or spelling errors?

The paper will be given a numeric grade from 1 to 5 for criteria 1 through 8. An excellent and exemplary response to a criterion will receive a grade of 5. A very good and comprehensive response will receive a grade of 4. A satisfactory response will receive a grade of 3. An incomplete response will receive a grade of 2. An unsatisfactory response will receive a grade of 1.

If the average of all the numeric grades is between 4.6 and 5, the paper will receive a grade of A. If the average of all the numeric grades is between 4.3 and 4.6, the paper will receive a grade of A-. If the average of all the numeric grades is between 4 and 4.3, the paper will receive a grade of B+. If the average of all the numeric grades is between 3.7 and 4, the paper will receive a grade of B. If the average of all the numeric grades is between 3.3 and 3.7, the paper will receive a grade of B-. If the average of all the numeric grades is between 3 and 3.3, the paper will receive a grade of C+. If the average of all the numeric grades is between 2.7 and 3, the paper will receive a grade of C. If the average of all the numeric grades is between 2.3 and 2.7, the paper will receive a grade of C-. If the average of all the numeric grades is between 2 and 2.3, the paper will receive a grade of D+. If the average of all the numeric grades is between 1.7 and 2, the paper will receive a grade of D. If the average of all the numeric grades is between 1.3 and 1.7, the paper will receive a grade of D-. If the average of all the numeric grades is less than 1.7, the paper will receive a grade of F.

 

 

Building List for Term Paper

 

Architecture of Ancient Greece

           Archaic period

            Temples:

                        Temple of Hera I, Paestum, Italy, 530 B.C.E.

                        Temple of Hera II, Paestum, Italy, 460 B.C.E.

 

           Classical period

            Ackropolis of Athens:

                        Propylaea, 437-432 B.C.E.

                        Temple of Athena Nike, 427-424 B.C.E.

                        Parthenon, 447-438 B.C.E.

                        Erchtheum, 420 B.C.E.

 

           Hellenistic Period

           Temples:

                        Temple of Apollo, Bassae, Greece, 420-410 B.C.E.

                        Temple of Apollo, Didyma, Turkey, 300 B.C.E.

                        Sancturay of Asclepius, Kos, Greece, 2nd Century B.C.E.

                        Alter of Zeus, Pergamon, Greece, 197-159 B.C.E.

            Bouleuterion:

                                    Miletus, Turkey, 175 B.C.E.

 

Roman Architecture

            Theaters:

                        Theater of Marcellus, Rome, Italy, 1st Century B.C.E.

            Amphitheaters:

                        Colosseum, Rome, Italy, 72-80 C.E.

           Forums:

                        Forum of Trajan, Rome, Italy, 113 C.E.

 

            Basilicas:

                        Basilica of Maxentius, Rome, 307-312 C.E.

                        Basilica, Trier, Germany, 4th Century C.E.

            Baths:

                        Baths of Caracalla, Rome, Italy, 211-217 C.E.

 

            Markets:

                        Markets of Trajan, Rome, Italy, 100-112 C.E.

 

            Temples:

                        Sanctuary of Fortuna Primigenia, Palestrina, Italy, 80 B.C.E.

                        Pantheon, Rome, Italy, 118-128 C.E.

 

            Emperial Palaces:

                        Nero's Golden House, "Domus Aurea", Rome, Italy, 64-68 C.E.

                        Hadeian's Villa, Tivoli, Italy, 118-134 C.E.

                        Palace of Diocletian, Split, Yugoslavia, 300 C.E.

 

 

 

Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture

            Churches:

                        Hagia Sophia, Constantinople, 532-537

                        S. Vitale, Ravenna, Italy, 526-547

            Martyriums:

                        Sta. Costanza, Rome, Italy, 350

                        S. Stefano Rotondo, Rome, 468-483

 

 

 

Carolingian and Romanesque Architecture

            Churches:

                        Palatine Chapel, Aachen, Germany, 796-805

                        Speyer Cathedral, Speyer, Germany, 1030-1080

                        St.-Foyes, Conques, France, 1050-1120

                        St.-Sernin, Toulouse, France, 1080-1120

                        S. Ambrogio, Milan, Italy, 12th Century

                        S. Miniato al Monte, Florance, Italy, 12th Century

                        Pisa Cathedral complex, pisa, Italy, 12th Century

            Monastery:

                        Cluny III, Cluny, France, 1088-1121

 

 

 

Gothic Architecture

           French Gothic

            Churches:

                        St. Denis, Paris, France, 1140-44

                        Laon Cathedral, Laon, France, b. 1160

                        Chartres Cathedral, Chartres, France, 1194-1220

                        Amiens Cathedral, Amiens, France, b. 1220

                        Ste.-Chapelle, Paris, France, 1241-48

 

           Italian Gothic

            Churches:

                        S. Francesco, Assisi, Italy, 1228-53

                        S. Croce, Florence, Italy, b. 1296

                        Florence Cathedral, Florence, Italy, b. 1296

 

 

 

Renaissance Architecture

           Filippo Brunelleschi

            Public Buildings:

                        Ospedale degli Innocenti - Foundling Hospital - Florence, Italy,1419-1424

            Churches:

                        S. Lorenzo, Old Sacristy (1421-28), Florence, Italy, 1421-25, 1441-1460

                        S. Spirito, Florence, Italy, 1436-1482

                        Pazzi Chapel, Sta. Croce (1294-1480), Florence, Italy, 1429-1446

 

           Leone Battista Alberti

            Churches - Temples:

                        S. Andrea,  Mantua, Italy, 1470-81

 

           Donato Bramante

            Churches - Temples:

                        Sta. Maria presso S. Satiro, Milan, Italy, 1485

                        Tempietto, S. Pietro in Montorio, Rome, Italy, 1504

                        Palazzo Caprini, Rome, Italy, b. 1510

 

           Guilio Romano

            Villas:

                        Palazzo del Te, Mantua, Italy, 1527-34

 

           Michelangelo

            Churches:

                        Medici Chapel, S. Lorenzo, Florence, Italy, b.1520

                        St. Peter´s, Vatican, Rome, Italy, 1546-64

            Libraries:

                        Laurentian Library, Florence, Italy, b. 1524

             Public Projects:

                        Piazza del Campidoglio, Rome, Italy, b. 1537

 

           Jacopo Sansovino

            Public Buildings:

                        Libreria di S. Marco, Venice, Italy, b. 1536

 

           Andrea Pallladio

            Villas:

                        Villa Rotonda, Vicenza, Italy, 1560

            Churches:

                        S. Giorgio Maggiore, Venice, Italy, b. 1566

                        Il Redentore, Venice, Italy, 1576-80

 

 

 

 

Arch History I